<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Bright Hall</title>
<link>http://brighthall.aol.com</link>
<description>Bright Hall</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Misunderstandings About Islam</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/14/misunderstandings-about-islam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/14/misunderstandings-about-islam/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/14/misunderstandings-about-islam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/featured-stories/" rel="tag">Featured Stories</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/umass/" rel="tag">UMass</a></p><img width="430" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="288" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2009/04/81670940.jpg" /><br /><br />For nearly a decade, Islam has been involved in heated debates throughout the United State. Many of the defining issues of our time have involved religious differences, and yet the Muslim world continues to be largely misrepresented by the media. Some of the most basic rules and beliefs within the faith remain unexplored or unknown. <br /><br />Here is a look at some common questions and misunderstandings.<br />
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br />o. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/beliefs/hijab_1.shtml">Hijab</a>, Muslim women's headscarf, is the most visible indicator of Islam today. Hijab literally translates to modesty and morality. Whether to veil or not depends on the interpretation of modesty among Muslim women. Some argue that Hijab oppresses women and limits their ability to interact in the social realm. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3805733.stm">Headscarf debates</a> have developed of late in Europe, where many Muslim women claim that Hijab should be an independent and optional choice.<br /><br />o. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2488829.stm">Hate crimes</a> and backlash against Middle Easterners and Muslims after the tragic 9/11 attack and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq have increased both in the US and in Europe. Still, for many the term Muslim means <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_2_19/ai_96238191/">terrorist</a>. The majority of these hate crimes are regularly committed against average Muslim citizens. It is often overlooked that terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda who are interpreting Islam to the most extreme ends are a small minority among Muslim sects and make up a minute population of Muslims around the world.<br /><br />o. So, how many wives is it? It is crucial to state that monogamy among Muslims is the norm. But it is true that Islam does not provide restrictions against <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/living/polygamy.shtml">polygamy</a>. When looking at the Quran -- the holy book of Muslims -- polygamy is encouraged at times of war, when many women are widowed and the support of orphans could strengthen the sense of society and community. At the same time, Islam only allows polygamy if the man is capable of providing equal opportunity and support for his wives. It is important to note that many Muslim scholars today are arguing for a more <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/us/18imams.html?scp=1&amp;sq=polygamy+in+islam&amp;st=nyt">modern</a> reinterpretation of Islamic laws.<br /><br />o. Are all Muslim Arabs? No. The largest <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_Muslim_countries">Muslim nation </a>in the world is Indonesia while Saudi Arabia is the largest Muslim Nation among Arab countries. Also, Christians, Jews, and other religious groups live in the Middle East along with Muslims.<br /></div>
<ul> </ul>
    <ol> </ol><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br />o. <a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/04/allah-by-any-other-name/?scp=3&amp;sq=Allah&amp;st=cse">Allah</a>, an Arabic word which means "one God" refers to the god of the monotheistic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It is often misunderstood that Allah of Islam is different from the God of Christianity. In the simplest words, Islam is an Ibrahamic religion which does not deny or disapprove of the other two Ibrahamic religions.<br /><br />o. Who is <a href="http://www.mohammad-pbuh.com/">Prophet Mohammad </a>? Muslims believe that Prophet Mohammad is the messenger of God. He is the last Prophet after Moses and Jesus. It is often thought that Muslims worship Prophet Mohammad as the God. Some controversies after the depictions of the Prophet in the Danish newspaper supported this belief that since Muslims worship the Prophet, they were <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/04/14/2542010.htm?section=entertainment">enraged</a>. Simply, Islam does not allow any depiction of the Prophet or other religious figures.<br /><br />o. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4693292.stm">72 virgins</a> promised? The idea that Islam promises 72 virgins to Muslim suicide bombers was spread for the first time by the publication of cartoons in a Danish newspaper in 2006. Many offended Muslims from around the world criticized the images. The debate over what <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.islam/msg/f0e1a933002b89b3">rewards and punishments</a> Islam promises to Muslims demands deep and detailed interpretations. However, Islam strictly condemns any type of suicide and there is no verse in the Quran that urges Muslims to sacrifice themselves for the sake of 72 virgin wives.<br /></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br />o. <a href="http://web.youngmuslims.ca/online_library/books/jihad/">Jihad</a> is one of the most debatable topics of Islam today. It carries various connotations. While it literally means to struggle, the interpretation of "holy war" has seemed to stick. What fascinates me the most about this topic is that only a small group of fundamental and militant Muslims interpret Jihad as what <a href="http://www.danielpipes.org/990/what-is-jihad">Daniel Pipes</a> and others call "legal, compulsory, communal effort to expand the territories ruled by Muslims at the expense of territories ruled by non-Muslims." <br /><br /><br /></div>
It is unfortunate how the majority of Islam world is accused of radical thinking on social, political and women's issues. If these simple questions and answers addressed here will soon be known fact, there is hope for a peaceful dialogue to further question assumptions and misunderstanding about Islam, the Middle East and Muslim women.<br />
<ul> </ul><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/14/misunderstandings-about-islam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1508152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/14/misunderstandings-about-islam/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/14/misunderstandings-about-islam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Parisa Saranj</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-04-14T00:01:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>It's Not a Pagan Ritual, I Swear</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/08/its-not-a-pagan-ritual-i-swear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/08/its-not-a-pagan-ritual-i-swear/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/08/its-not-a-pagan-ritual-i-swear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/washington-university/" rel="tag">Washington University</a></p><img width="400" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="277" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2009/04/85859245.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />So a large group of Jews gets together early in the morning and they start to pray toward the sun -- no, it's not the start of a really bad joke, it's a description of the rarest event in Jewish practice occurring only once every 28 years.<br /><br />More specifically, the ritual, known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birkat_HaHammah">Birkat Hachama</a>, is a blessing recited in appreciation of the sun, timed to occur when -- based on Talmudic calculations -- the sun is at the place in which it was created.<br /><br />The observation of the ritual consists of reciting of the blessing "Blessed art thou, Lord our God, Author of Creation" and several scriptural passages. From start to finish, it can be completed in several minutes, but has brought together Jews around the world of varying degrees of observance.<br /><embed width="400" height="350" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/15254205001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=18922692001&amp;playerId=15254205001&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br /><br />So far, by all accounts this year's commemoration of Birkat Hachama has been more successful than the observance in 1897 when, <a href="http://www.chabad.org/media/pdf/282/PVOH2826229.pdf">according to The New York Times</a>, one rabbi fled and another was arrested after failing to obtain a permit for an assemblage of hundreds of "orthodox Hebrews" in Tompkins Square. The rabbis' explanations in limited English to the Irish-American police officer didn't help, the article said, and tensions mounted.<br /><br />The blessing will next be recited in 2037.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/08/its-not-a-pagan-ritual-i-swear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1512173/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/08/its-not-a-pagan-ritual-i-swear/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/04/08/its-not-a-pagan-ritual-i-swear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>birkat hachama</category><category>BirkatHachama</category><category>judaism</category><category>sun</category><dc:creator>Sam Guzik</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-04-08T17:33:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Obama Commencement Coverage Focuses on Protesters</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/26/notre-dame-obama-commencement-coverage-focuses-on-protestors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/26/notre-dame-obama-commencement-coverage-focuses-on-protestors/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/26/notre-dame-obama-commencement-coverage-focuses-on-protestors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/news-1/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/local/" rel="tag">Local</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/media/" rel="tag">Media</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/notre-dame/" rel="tag">Notre Dame</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;">Kaitlynn Riely, a student at the University of Notre Dame, is delivering the latest news and opinions on the growing Obama Commencement controversy from South Bend. See her coverage on the progression of this media event <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/20/obama-to-give-commencement-address-at-three-colleges/">here</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/">here</a> and <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/25/bishop-to-boycott-obama-commencement-speech-at-notre-dame/">here</a>.<span style=""><br /><img width="225" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="346" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2009/03/nd_campus.jpg" alt="" /> <br /><span style="font-style: normal;">I'm starting to feel like I'm living in an abortion debate-themed production of West Side Story. <br /><br />Ever since Notre Dame announced that President Barack Obama would deliver the May 17 Commencement address, those against hosting Obama because of his pro-choice beliefs and actions have been rumbling, mostly on the Internet and in print, with those who want him to speak here.<br /><br />I can almost hear the snapping. <br /><br />The argument is taking place in the opinion pages of Notre Dame's student newspaper, <a href="http://www.ndsmcobserver.com/">The Observer</a>. The national media has picked up the story. Catholic and pro-life blogs and Web sites are condemning the University for asking a pro-choice politician to speak at Notre Dame and deciding to give him an honorary doctor of laws degree.<br /><br />But for all the Obama drama, I've only spoken to a few students who are against him speaking here in May. And back in October, Notre Dame's <a href="http://media.www.ndsmcobserver.com/media/storage/paper660/news/2008/10/08/News/Nd.Students.Vote.Obama.In.Mock.Election-3475990.shtml">student government conducted a mock election</a> and the results were 52.6 percent for Obama, 41.1 percent for McCain. <br /><br />The reason it seems, from media coverage, like popular Notre Dame community sentiment is against having Obama speak is because the people opposed to Obama speaking are doing a very good job of organizing and getting their opinion out.</span></span></span><br /><br />Case in point: Today, a coalition of Notre Dame student groups launched a Web site and<a href="http://www.ndresponse.com/"> issued a press release</a> denouncing the University's choice of Obama as Commencement speaker, an objection, they said, that was not based on "political partisanship" but due to Obama's "hostility to the Catholic Church's teachings on the sanctity of human life at its earliest stages." <br /><br />The coalition, made up of 11 Notre Dame student groups, asked that only members of the Notre Dame community lead protests against the University's decision. <br /><br />"Over the next several weeks, in response to this scandal, our organizations will host various academic and religious events to engage the University community," the statement said. It was signed by the 11 student clubs, which include the Notre Dame chapters of Right to Life and the College Republicans. <br /><br />A Notre Dame <a href="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/haveObamaatND/index.html">alum started an online petition</a> for people who support having Obama on campus, but that petition has gotten little notice. Scan the Internet, and it would seem most Notre Dame people oppose Obama speaking and receiving an honorary degree. It is true that there are many, many people who are against him speaking, and their position has merit. But the media is ignoring the large numbers who are thrilled to have Obama speak at Commencement. <br /><br />The White House responded to the controversy late Tuesday,<a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/"> reported ABC's Political Punch blog</a>. Deputy White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Obama was "honored" to address the graduation class, but said he understands there are students, parents and alums who don't want him there. <br /><br />"While he is honored to have the support of millions of people of all faiths, including Catholics with their rich tradition of recognizing the dignity of people, he does not govern with the expectation that everyone sees eye to eye with him on every position and the spirit of debate and healthy disagreement on important issues is part of what he loves about this country," Psaki said. <br /><br />But the negative reaction has been so loud, and so widely covered, that there's been less coverage of the "healthy disagreement" and more coverage of the outrage by some about the choice. I cannot foresee Obama deciding not to come, or Notre Dame rescinding his invitation. When May 17 has passed, will the story of this controversy be that most Notre Dame people were against his coming? Or will it be clear that many students supported Obama speaking at graduation?<br /><br />As I did yesterday, I'll end again with my favorite Obama Drama moment of the day. Two Notre Dame students were interviewed on Fox's <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/">Greta Van Susteren</a> Wednesday night about their opposition to Obama. At the end of the interview, Van Susteren congratulated the girls on their upcoming graduation. <br /><br />Her congrats came about a year too early. Both girls are juniors, so they cannot go to Commencement anyway. Greta ended the segment before they could make the correction. <br /><br />Everyone has the right to have an opinion on Obama speaking at Commencement, but let's see the media seek the opinions of Notre Dame seniors, for whom this decision primarily affects.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/26/notre-dame-obama-commencement-coverage-focuses-on-protestors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1498759/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/26/notre-dame-obama-commencement-coverage-focuses-on-protestors/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/26/notre-dame-obama-commencement-coverage-focuses-on-protestors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kaitlynn Riely</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-26T02:01:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Bishop to Boycott Obama Commencement Speech at Notre Dame</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/25/bishop-to-boycott-obama-commencement-speech-at-notre-dame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/25/bishop-to-boycott-obama-commencement-speech-at-notre-dame/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/25/bishop-to-boycott-obama-commencement-speech-at-notre-dame/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/campus-issues/" rel="tag">Small Campus, Big Story</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/news-1/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/local/" rel="tag">Local</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/media/" rel="tag">Media</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/notre-dame/" rel="tag">Notre Dame</a></p><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="400" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2009/03/82392185--dome.jpg" /><br /><br />Bishop John M. D'Arcy, who presides over Indiana's Fort Wayne-South Bend Diocese, which includes Notre Dame, announced Tuesday he will not be attending Notre Dame's May 17 Commencement, since President Barack Obama will be speaking. <br /><br />"Can I have the Bishop's ticket?" my friend posted on the Web site Twitter.com. <br /><br />D'Arcy has clashed with Notre Dame in the past, most significantly when University President Fr. John Jenkins issued a statement in 2006 <a href="http://media.www.ndsmcobserver.com/media/storage/paper660/news/2006/04/28/News/Dissenters.Criticize.Jenkins.Statement-1882202.shtml">allowing The Vagina Monologues to be performed on campus</a>. Now it's Obama's pro-choice stances and decisions, rather than vaginas, that have gotten D'Arcy's Irish up. <br /><br /><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/20/obama-to-give-commencement-address-at-three-colleges/">Notre Dame and the White House announced Friday</a> that Obama would be speaking at Notre Dame's May 17 Commencement ceremony, with Jenkins following up Monday clarifying that asking Obama to speak, and awarding him with an honorary doctor of laws degree, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/">does not signify support of his policies</a>. Most students, from my observations on campus, seem to be supportive of and excited about hearing Obama speak. But a vocal student minority, as well as alumni and unaffiliated pro-life groups, have protested the decision vehemently. <br /><br />In his statement Tuesday, D'Arcy said Jenkins informed him of Obama's acceptance shortly before the announcement was made. D'Arcy said it was the first time he'd been told about the invitation. This May is the 25th Notre Dame graduation since D'Arcy became bishop, and for the first time, he said, <a href="http://www.diocesefwsb.org/COMMUNICATIONS/statements.htm">he will not attend</a>. <br /><br />"After much prayer, I have decided not to attend the graduation," he said. "I wish no disrespect to our president, I pray for him and wish him well. I have always revered the Office of the Presidency. But a bishop must teach the Catholic faith 'in season and out of season,' and he teaches not only by his words -- but by his actions."<br /><br />He added: "My decision is not an attack on anyone, but is in defense of the truth about human life." <br /><br />I understand that D'Arcy has major disagreements with Obama over abortion and stem cell issues. But isn't he giving up a unique opportunity to pull the president aside for a moment and voice his concerns? It may not make a difference in Obama's stances, but when else will D'Arcy have the ear of the president?<br /><br />I'm unimpressed with D'Arcy's leadership. The pro-life movement's sign-carrying, march-making approach hasn't worked so far, and I doubt the Bishop's boycott will make any difference in abortion policy in the United States. It just distances the Catholic Church from the decision-making process. <br /><br />Too bad. I wish D'Arcy had been a bit braver and seen the opportunity, rather than ask whether Notre Dame has "chosen prestige over truth."<br /><br />D'Arcy's ticket won't go to waste. Notre Dame seniors, who are only guaranteed 3 tickets each for graduation, have been posting on Facebook asking those who don't want Obama to speak at Notre Dame to give away their tickets. <br /><br />Security itself on graduation day promises to be intense. But already, with two months to go, life in the Notre Dame bubble is becoming surreal. Leaving the gym this afternoon, I stopped by a television because a woman from a local television station was delivering a report from my campus. <br /><br />When I got back to my room, a friend told me Notre Dame was on CNN. <br /><br />Does this controversy have the momentum to last two months? Pro-life groups will certainly try their best. Everyone here has a viewpoint on the Obama drama. <br /><br />My favorite opinion of the day came in a letter to the editor published in Notre Dame's student newspaper, The Observer. The author of the letter is a student at Saint Mary's, the all-women college across the street from Notre Dame, who asked whether the Notre Dame "administration considered the impact such an important political figurehead will have on the <a href="http://media.www.ndsmcobserver.com/media/storage/paper660/news/2009/03/24/Viewpoint/Choice.Affects.Everyone-3680176.shtml">travel plans of the other schools</a> graduating that weekend." <br /><br />I imagine potential traffic congestion is the last thing Jenkins is thinking about this week.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/25/bishop-to-boycott-obama-commencement-speech-at-notre-dame/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1497509/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/25/bishop-to-boycott-obama-commencement-speech-at-notre-dame/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/25/bishop-to-boycott-obama-commencement-speech-at-notre-dame/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kaitlynn Riely</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-25T00:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Debate Over Obama Notre Dame Commencement Address Heats Up</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/campus-issues/" rel="tag">Small Campus, Big Story</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/breaking-news/" rel="tag">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/news-1/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/local/" rel="tag">Local</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/notre-dame/" rel="tag">Notre Dame</a></p><img width="425" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="294" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2009/03/obama_indiana.jpg" /><br /><br />The White House and Notre Dame announced last Friday that President Barack Obama would be the main speaker at the May 17 <a href="http://newsinfo.nd.edu/news/11293-president-obama-to-deliver-notre-dames-commencement-address">Commencement ceremony</a> and would be awarded an honorary doctor of laws degree, a decision that has caused controversy among many in the Catholic community. <br /><br />Though many students and alums of the University are pleased to have the president speak at Commencement, those opposed to the decision have been far more vocal, as students, alumni and people not affiliated with Notre Dame voiced their protestations loudly throughout the Internet and in Notre Dame's student newspaper. <br /><br />Fr. John Jenkins, the president of Notre Dame, gave an interview to The Observer, the student newspaper, Sunday in which he responded to the criticism and said he did not "foresee" circumstances in which Notre Dame would rescind the invitation to the president. (Full disclosure: I work for The Observer.)<br /><br />"We have invited the president and <a href="http://media.www.ndsmcobserver.com/media/storage/paper660/news/2009/03/23/News/Jenkins.Obama.honored.University.By.Accepting-3679015.shtml">he's honored us by accepting</a>," he told The Observer. <br /><br />There's been an uproar about the decision, judging by letters to the editor, blog posts and petitions, due to Obama's pro-abortion stances. Jenkins defended his choice, saying the invitation to Obama does not signify an endorsement. <br /><br />"The invitation of President Obama to be our Commencement speaker should in no way be taken as condoning or endorsing his positions on specific issues regarding the protection of life, such as abortion and embryonic stem cell research," Jenkins told The Observer. <br /><br />The protestations against the choice of Obama have been very loud, especially in the opinion section of The Observer, but it should be noted that in a mock election held by Notre Dame's student government last October, <a href="http://media.www.ndsmcobserver.com/media/storage/paper660/news/2008/10/07/News/Students.To.Cast.Ballots.In.Mock.Election-3473609-page2.shtml">Obama won 52.6 percent of the vote</a> compared to McCain's 41.1 percent. <br /><br />Not everyone is protesting Obama coming to campus; many are thrilled. A Facebook group titled "We Will Be Honored To Have President Obama at Notre Dame" has 1,389 members. Several Facebook groups, however, have been created to protest Obama as Commencement speaker. <br /><br />All I wanted was a nice, quiet, peaceful graduation day, a time to celebrate with my family and friends, without posters of aborted fetuses. Such a simple request. But it won't be so. <br /><br />Already, pro-life activists are making plans to come to South Bend to protest.<br /><br />A Web site called notredamescandal.com has set up an <a href="http://notredamescandal.com/">online petition to ask Jenkins to rescind the invitation</a>, saying it is in violation of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' 2004 document called "<a href="http://www.usccb.org/bishops/catholicsinpoliticallife.shtml">Catholics in Political Life</a>," which states that "those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles" "should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions" by Catholic institutions. <br /><br />The Web site, launched by the <a href="http://www.cardinalnewmansociety.org/">Cardinal Newman Society,</a> claims it has nearly 48,000 signatures. The Cardinal Newman Society, established in 1993, is "dedicated to renewing and strengthening Catholic identity at America's 224 Catholic colleges and universities," according to its Web site. <br /><br />National Review Online, the Web site of the conservative magazine, asked various commentators to give their views on Notre Dame's speaker choice. <br /><br />It's become popular in American discourse to invoke Hitler when making a point about something one views as egregious. On National Review's Web site, Fr. George W. Rutler, a Catholic priest in New York, skipped that tiresome cliche and <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTBlNmY2NzM4ODdkNDY0NzRjMzA3OTZlYjg5YzcwYjU=">brought back an oldie</a>:<br /><br />"If a Midwestern school seeks attention by granting Obama an honorary doctorate in law, the next logical step would be to grant Judas Iscariot posthumously an honorary doctorate in business administration," he wrote. <br /><br />This is only day three of the Great Obama Debate; there is no end in sight. Outside the Notre Dame bubble, I'm sure, no one is talking about the Obama Commencement speaker choice. But it's hard to see reality beyond the bubble while on campus. Here, it is the primary topic of conversation. <br /><br />Anecdotally, I'd say most seniors I've talked to are excited about Obama coming to speak at graduation. But those who are against Obama speaking are making a lot more noise in the student paper and on the Internet.<br /><br />My advice to Fr. Jenkins is to fire Charlie Weis and re-hire Ty Willingham. There's nothing like breaking football news to change the topic of conversation at Notre Dame.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1496373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/24/notre-dame-debate-over-obama-commencement-address-heats-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kaitlynn Riely</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-24T01:03:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Survey Shows More Claiming "No Religion"</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/10/survey-shows-more-claiming-no-religion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/10/survey-shows-more-claiming-no-religion/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/10/survey-shows-more-claiming-no-religion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/breaking-news/" rel="tag">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/notre-dame/" rel="tag">Notre Dame</a></p>"One nation under God" might still be accurate, but more of those "under God" are claiming to belong to "no religion" than were twenty years ago. <br /><br />The American Religious Identification Survey, conducted by<a href="http://www.trincoll.edu/AboutTrinity/News_Events/trinity_news/030909_Religion.htm"> Trinity College in Hartford, Conn</a>., reported that 75 percent of Americans call themselves Christians, down from 86 percent in 1990. <br /><br />I don't think it's time to panic yet that Americans are losing God, or at least the Christian God. If this economic downturn keeps up, I think a lot more Americans will find Him. Or go to church to find Him. <br /><br />The survey, conducted between February and November of 2008, found that the percentage of Americans claiming no religion jumped to 15 percent from 2001, when it was 14.2 percent. (The percentage of Americans who claimed no religion was 8.2 percent in 1990.)<br /><br />According to the survey's press release, the jump in the percentage from 2001 to 2008, give the estimated growth of the American population from 207 million to 228 million, reflects an additional 4.7 million claiming no religion. The survey reported that Northern New England has surpassed the Pacific Northwest as the least religious section of the country, with Vermont, at 34 percent claiming no religion, leading all other states by nine points.<br /><br />The survey found that the percentage of Catholics in the United States has remained steady at about one in four since 1990. <br /><br />The Muslim populations has grown from .3 percent in 1990 to .5 percent in 2001 to .6 percent in 2008. <br /><br />Mark Silk of Trinity College <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/03/09/us.religion.less.christian/index.html">told CNN</a> it has become more socially acceptable than it once was to admit having no religion. <br /><br />"You're not declaring yourself a total pariah," he said. "The culture has changed in a way that makes it easier to say, 'No, I don't have a religion.' Even in the past year, Mitt Romney and Barack Obama feel obliged to talk about 'those of no faith.'" CNN added that Obama mentioned people without faith in his inaugural address in January. <br /><br />Silk said the the rise in those giving the "no religion" answer is the only trend the survey shows across every single state. <br /><br />"One nation under God?" Yes. One nation of church-going, collections-donating individuals? Maybe less than 20 years ago.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/10/survey-shows-more-claiming-no-religion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1483455/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/10/survey-shows-more-claiming-no-religion/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/03/10/survey-shows-more-claiming-no-religion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kaitlynn Riely</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-10T11:51:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Catholic Church Offering Indulgences Again</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/02/11/catholic-church-offering-indulgences-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/02/11/catholic-church-offering-indulgences-again/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/02/11/catholic-church-offering-indulgences-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/news-1/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/notre-dame/" rel="tag">Notre Dame</a></p><a href="http://www.ebay.com/"><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="292" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2009/02/84621153---pope.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/nyregion/10indulgence.html?_r=1&amp;em">published a front p</a><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/nyregion/10indulgence.html?_r=1&amp;em">age story</a> Tuesday saying that Roman Catholics can once again receive indulgences, or reprieves from punishment in the afterlife. <br /><br />When I read that, I wondered whether I had picked up <em>The Canterbury Tales</em> by mistake. <br /><br />But it's true. In exchange for prayers, devotions or pilgrimages, Catholics can have their time in Purgatory, the punishment before entering heaven, reduced or erased instantly. <br /><br />Indulgences have gotten the Catholic Church in trouble before. Remember the Protestant Reformation, anyone? The selling of indulgences led Martin Luther to start the movement that led to a schism with the Catholic Church. <br /><br />The Church says now that you cannot buy an indulgence, but charitable contributions, when combined with other acts, can earn you one.<br /><br />But once you start offering indulgences, you know people are going to start selling them. I thought it would take a few weeks or months, but I was wrong. If you go to eBay, <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/POPE-PIUS-X-PARDON-CRUCIFIX-WITH-PLENARY-INDULGENCES_W0QQitemZ310120975334QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item310120975334&amp;_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&amp;_trkparms=72%3A1205%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A1%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50">you can bid for you very own "indulgence."</a> There's a crucifix selling right now for $7.99. Just wearing the crucifix on your person gets you an indulgence, the seller says. Kiss the crucifix, and you get another indulgence. <br /><br />I think Martin Luther would tell the pope he told him so.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/02/11/catholic-church-offering-indulgences-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1456559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/02/11/catholic-church-offering-indulgences-again/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/02/11/catholic-church-offering-indulgences-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kaitlynn Riely</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-11T08:39:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Many Are Losing Faith in Bernard Madoff</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/01/24/many-are-losing-faith-in-bernard-madoff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/01/24/many-are-losing-faith-in-bernard-madoff/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/01/24/many-are-losing-faith-in-bernard-madoff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/international-news/" rel="tag">International News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/money-and-finance/" rel="tag">Money</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/towson-university/" rel="tag">Towson University</a></p><img alt="" hspace="50" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2009/01/bernard-madoff-exiting-courthouse-240b-012409.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Since December 11, Bernard Madoff has been possibly the most infamous man on the planet, and even before he faces indictment on February 11, things just keep getting worse. Although he still enjoys <a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am5.html">the right to due process</a> and the implicit presumption of innocence until he has been proven guilty, he has essentially waived that, both in private and in public.<br /><br />On December 10, in a discussion regarding the order of a premature payment of annual bonuses to employees with his sons Mark and Andrew, Madoff admitted to them that the investment arm of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC was "<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=atUk.QnXAvZY">all just one big lie</a>." The day afterward, they turned their father over to the FBI.<br /><br />Before being taken into custody on December 11, Madoff told two FBI agents that "<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=atUk.QnXAvZY">there is no innocent explanation</a>" for his actions.<br /><br />According to <a href="http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2008/comp-madoff121108.pdf">a Securities and Exchange Comission complaint</a>, $50 billion in investments can not be paid because Madoff had been paying investors with, in his own words, "<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=atUk.QnXAvZY">money that wasn't there</a>."<br /><br />While under house arrest, Madoff <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/business/06madoff.html?_r=1&amp;em">mailed $1 million in jewelry as gifts</a> rather than letting them become seized as assets due to victims of his alleged decades of fraud.<br /><br />Earlier this week, Reuters reported that Rabbi Joshua Hammerman of the Temple Beth El in Stamford, Connecticut sent a letter to the <a href="http://www.conferenceofpresidents.org/">Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations</a>, seeking the excommunication of Madoff from Judaism. A direct quote from <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE50K6BO20090122">the Reuters article</a>: "Hammerman, of Temple Beth El, said that Madoff's alleged crimes are so deep there is no other appropriate response from American Jews than to kick him out of the faith".<br /><br />The New York Times maintains <a href="http://projects.nytimes.com/creditcrisis/madoff_clients/table">an updating list</a> of worldwide BMIS investors. The charity founded by Holocaust survivor and 1986 Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel has issued <a href="http://www.eliewieselfoundation.org/madofffraudstatement.aspx">a public statement</a> that "substantially all of the Foundation's assets," $15.2 million, were lost to Madoff.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/01/24/many-are-losing-faith-in-bernard-madoff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1439838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/01/24/many-are-losing-faith-in-bernard-madoff/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2009/01/24/many-are-losing-faith-in-bernard-madoff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Adam Kirchner</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-01-24T22:26:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Playboy Apologizes for Virgin Mary Cover</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/12/15/playboy-apologizes-for-virgin-mary-cover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/12/15/playboy-apologizes-for-virgin-mary-cover/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/12/15/playboy-apologizes-for-virgin-mary-cover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/featured-stories/" rel="tag">Featured Stories</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/st-john-fisher-college/" rel="tag">St. John Fisher College</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/odd-news/" rel="tag">Odd News</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/12/playboy.jpg" />Playboy recently got in a little bit of trouble in Mexico, where the Mexican edition of the magazine came out last Thursday with the model on the cover appearing to imitate the Virgin Mary.<br /><br />Playboy publisher claimed that this was not the intent, saying "The image is not and never was intended to portray the Virgin of Guadalupe," -- which is the Virgin Mary -- "The intent was to portray a renaissance-like mood on the cover." Looking at the image, it is pretty hard to argue that it was unintentional. To make matters a little more sticky, the magazine was <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/12/15/playboy.virgin.mary.transcript/index.html">printed just days</a> before the Feast of the Immaculate Conception and the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, which are both Catholic holidays centering on the Virgin Mary.<br /><br />"Te Adoramos, Maria" <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,466565,00.html">translates to</a> "We love you, Mary" in English, but the model's name is <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT">Maria (the phrase can also translate to We Love You, Maria), so it is most likely referring to her and not the Virgin Mary. </span>While that may be the case, the cover was still very offensive to Catholics not only in Mexico, but around the world. <br /><br />In response to upset Catholics, Playboy recently <a href="http://religionblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/12/playboy-apologizes-for-cover-i.html">released a statemen</a>t saying, "While Playboy Mexico never meant for the cover or images to offend anyone, we recognize that it has created offense, and we as well as Playboy Mexico offer our sincerest apologies."Now, Playboy isn't the most tasteful of publications and I wouldn't consider it a work of journalism, but this seems to cross the line in a big way. <br /><br />In an interview with CNN, Father Albert Cutie of Mexico went so far as calling the cover a blasphemy because Catholics do not adore Mary, they adore only God. So not only was the image a blasphemy, but insinuating that people adore the Virgin Mary goes against the Catholic religion as well. He went on to call the magazine "desperate" for using a religious figure to try to sell more magazines. <br /><br />So, what do you think? Was Playboy wrong in publishing this cover, or are people just overreacting?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/12/15/playboy-apologizes-for-virgin-mary-cover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1402362/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/12/15/playboy-apologizes-for-virgin-mary-cover/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/12/15/playboy-apologizes-for-virgin-mary-cover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Megan Baker</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-12-15T20:04:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Chaplain Labels Homosexuals a Health Hazard</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/10/12/chaplain-labels-homosexuals-a-health-hazard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/10/12/chaplain-labels-homosexuals-a-health-hazard/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/10/12/chaplain-labels-homosexuals-a-health-hazard/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/brown-university/" rel="tag">Brown University</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;">Catherine Cullen is writing for Bright Hall from Galway, Ireland where she is completing a study abroad program and enriching herself in Anglo-European culture.</span><br /><br />An English clergyman has called for gay men to be labeled as health hazards in the same manner the government marks cartons of cigarettes. Seriously.<br /><br />In place of prominent bold-print stick-on labels, Reverend Doctor Peter Mullen suggests <a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24459030-663,00.html">tattoos</a>. He debuted the plan on his blog, writing "Let us make it obligatory for homosexuals to have their backsides tattooed with the slogan SODOMY CAN SERIOUSLY DAMAGE YOUR HEALTH and their chins with FELLATIO KILLS."<br /> The London bishop denounced Mullen's rant as "highly offensive" and the blog post has since been removed. However Mullen has defended himself against public outrage, claiming that his blog was a satirical work, in keeping with the English comic tradition.<br /> <br /> What bothers me about this... well how does one begin to narrow it down? There's the sad irony of a reverend who is in touch enough with the modern public to make himself heard on a internet blog, only to be so out of touch as to not anticipate how that same public might respond to his "joke." There's the fact that a member of the clergy is no longer happy with simply damning homosexuals in the next life, but wants to brand them in this one. And of course, there's always the overwhelming stupidity of Mullen's wild accusations. <br /> <br /> Sodomy can seriously damage your health? I'd love to see Mullen argue that point without being countered with any instance in which good old-fashioned, church-sanctioned, missionary position sex between heterosexuals isn't equally... ahem... damaging. Same goes for fatal fellatio. I frankly don't know anyone who died as the result of a good blow job. Or a bad one for that matter. Perhaps Mullen would like to clarify that point?<br /> <br /> I'm all for free speech. Mr Mullen is a member of a private institution (albeit a public face) and he has a right to his opinion and the right to express it in any forum he sees fit. Thankfully, I enjoy the same rights and I can express my utter disgust at his unenlightened, unproductuve and frankly unChristian attitude. And did I mention unfunny? Of course, I might just be out of touch with Mullen's "<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/3145269/Homosexuals-should-carry-warning-tattoos-says-chaplain.html">tradition of English satire</a>." Thank God for that.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/10/12/chaplain-labels-homosexuals-a-health-hazard/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1339831/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/10/12/chaplain-labels-homosexuals-a-health-hazard/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/10/12/chaplain-labels-homosexuals-a-health-hazard/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Catherine Cullen</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-10-12T09:49:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Are There Angels Among Us?</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/19/are-there-angels-among-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/19/are-there-angels-among-us/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/19/are-there-angels-among-us/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/st-john-fisher-college/" rel="tag">St. John Fisher College</a></p><img width="375" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="284" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/09/angel.jpg" /><br /><br />According to a new poll by the Baylor University Institute for Studies of Religion, a majority Americans not only believe in guardian angels, but feel that they have been protected by one at some point in their life. The study surveyed 1700 respondents, and of these, 55% answered affirmatively to the statement, "I was protected from harm by a guardian angel."<br /><br />According to an article in <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1842179,00.html">Time</a>, what is interesting about this study is that the "experiences" transcended religious boundaries. <br /><br />On one hand, you have Catholicism and other "analytical" religions that are "suspicious of any modern-day irruption of the supernatural into religious life," while on the other, you have Pentecostalism<em> </em>where "supernatural events" (i.e. speaking in tongues) are commonplace. The study found that while there are these differences, both sides felt about the same in regards to the idea of guardian angels.<br /><br />If you are one of those people who has experienced what can be categorized as a religious experience or an encounter with a guardian angel, feel free to share your story.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/19/are-there-angels-among-us/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1319108/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/19/are-there-angels-among-us/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/19/are-there-angels-among-us/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Megan Baker</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-09-19T11:41:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Scientology: Banished in France?</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/18/the-french-arent-down-with-scientology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/18/the-french-arent-down-with-scientology/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/18/the-french-arent-down-with-scientology/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/st-john-fisher-college/" rel="tag">St. John Fisher College</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/news-1/" rel="tag">News</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/09/cruise.jpg" />The Church of Scientology in France is being charged with <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7604311.stm">"organized fraud"</a> which, if convicted of these charges, means that Scientology will be banned in France. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.scientology.org/home.html">Scientology</a>, which literally means "the study of truth" was founded by science fiction author L. Ron Hubbard in 1953. Scientologists believe that man is an immortal being that "can solve his own problems,   accomplish his goals and gain lasting happiness, but also   achieve new, higher states of awareness and ability."<br /><br />Scientology has been a recognized religion in the U.S. since 1993. It has attracted a large following including celebrities like Tom Cruise and the late Isaac Hayes, who left his job as the voice of Chef on the Comedy Central cartoon South Park after the writers made fun of the religion.<br /><br />While it is accepted in America, Scientology has been scrutinized in other countries such as Germany, Spain and most recently, France. According to <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/Story?id=5829728&amp;page=1">ABC News</a>, "France has refused to acknowledge Scientology as a religion, and Miviludes, the French government agency in charge of protecting its citizens from sectarian manipulations, has warned French citizens against participating."<br /><br />Guess Tom and Katie won't be vacationing there anytime soon...<br />The French are skeptical about Scientology because of the vast amounts of money members may spend on the religion. Daniele Gounord, spokesperson for Scientology in France, told ABC News that it was possible for members to spend up to $40,000 in the first few years if "a member is willing to progress fast."<br /><br />In 2002, Scientology in France was charged with violating France's data privacy law after they continued to send a former member information in the mail after he requested to be removed from the list. Dismissed as a technical problem, the church was not required to pay the $7,000 fine they were at first charged with.<br /><br />In the most recent case, a woman is claiming that she was approached by Scientologists in a Paris street in 1998 and offered a free personality test. After this, she ended up giving the church more than 20,000 Euros for things such as books, classes, illegally prescribed drugs and an "electrometer," which is a tool that is supposed to measure fluctuations in the mental state. <br /><br />Scientology is notorious for being an expensive religion, and some would even go as far as calling it a cult. In recent years there has been an explosion in celebrity religiosity which also includes Kaballah, you know, that strand of Judaism where you get to wear that cool red string?<br /><br />All this case really shows is people are morons. The Scientologists didn't force her to hand over that much money, it was her desperation to make her life better. So when it didn't work out, how is it Scientology's fault? She's just mad because she looks like a fool and probably has bad credit now. Scientology must work for some people, hell, it made Cruise jump on a couch on national television, didn't it?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/18/the-french-arent-down-with-scientology/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1318270/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/18/the-french-arent-down-with-scientology/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/18/the-french-arent-down-with-scientology/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Megan Baker</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-09-18T15:57:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Muslim Student Site Edited by University Admin</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/08/university-hits-delete-on-muslim-student-group-website/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/08/university-hits-delete-on-muslim-student-group-website/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/08/university-hits-delete-on-muslim-student-group-website/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/usc/" rel="tag">USC</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/news-1/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/local/" rel="tag">Local</a></p>From the Daily Trojan, student newspaper at the University of Southern California: "Provost C. L. Max Nikias has <a href="http://media.www.dailytrojan.com/media/storage/paper679/news/2008/09/05/News/Deleted.Site.Causes.Stir.For.Muslim.Organization-3417321.shtml?reffeature=recentlycommentedstoriestab">approved the deletion</a> of part of a Muslim student group website that hosted religious documents urging Muslims to kill Jewish people. The material was removed from a collection of scriptures known as hadiths, historical sayings of the Prophet Muhammad not included in the Quran."<br /><br />So apparently, my university hosts <a href="http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/041.smt.html#041.6981">a massive online collection of hadiths</a>. Who knew? Stowed away in this endless collection of reading material, in Book 041, Numbers 6981-6985, were various iterations of: "You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me); kill him."<br /><br />Full text after the jump.<br /><br />In a <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/Provost.pdf">letter to USC trustee Alan Casden</a>, Nikias called the passage "truly despicable" and said it violates the university's Principles of Community. <br /><br />The Muslim Student Union, the largest Muslim student group on campus, said the university had ruined a classic: "We are outraged at the censorship of a complete religious and classic text without consulting us or any religious authority first," the group said in the statement. "The 'compendium' is now incomplete. There are verses in many religious texts (be it the Torah or the New Testament) that when taken out of context can be taken as offensive."<br /><br />Classic texts or not, the University ultimately has the right to decide what rests on its servers. The MSU says Nikias should have consulted religious authorities first -- and perhaps he did -- but you can't fault the university for deleting that specific text. It does not appear alongside any contradicting or explanatory statements, and so readers could reasonably interpret the text literally. (Whether that hadith is meant literally or not, I cannot say; I am not a theologian.)<br /><br />Regardless, I was amused to find that identical text is still being hosted by USC, in <a href="http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html">a different part of the same site</a>:<br /><br style="font-weight: bold;" /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Killing the Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177: </span>(<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><a href="http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html">from USC's website</a>)<span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic;">Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'"</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />Deleted hadiths: </span><br />Book 041, Number 6981: <span style="font-style: italic;">Ibn 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me); kill him.<br /><br /></span>Number 6982: <span style="font-style: italic;">Ubaidullah has reported this hadith with this chain of transmitters (and the Words are): "There is a Jew behind me."<br /><br /></span>Number 6983: <span style="font-style: italic;">Abdullah b. 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You and the Jews would fight against one another until a stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him. <br /></span><br />Number 6984:<span style="font-style: italic;"> Abdullah b. 'Umar reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: The Jews will fight against you and you will gain victory over them until the stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; kill him. <br /></span><br />Number 6985: <span style="font-style: italic;">Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span> <br />(Source: <a href="http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/muslim/041.html">muslimaccess.com</a>)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/08/university-hits-delete-on-muslim-student-group-website/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1308214/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/08/university-hits-delete-on-muslim-student-group-website/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/09/08/university-hits-delete-on-muslim-student-group-website/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Joshua Sharp</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-09-08T21:05:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Would a Muslim Wear This?</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/24/would-a-muslim-wear-this/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/24/would-a-muslim-wear-this/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/24/would-a-muslim-wear-this/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/us-elections/" rel="tag">US Elections</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/breaking-news/" rel="tag">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/boston-university/" rel="tag">Boston University</a></p>International superstar Barack Obama was in Israel this week, trying to prove he is not a Muslim.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />Well, that's not exactly why he was there. Mostly it was a "fact-finding"<img width="231" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="214" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/07/82050519.jpg" alt="" /> mission to meet with leaders of the <st1:place w:st="on">Middle East</st1:place> and boost his foreign-policy credentials. But it certainly didn't hurt to throw on a Jewish yarmulke and visit the Western Wall at a time when a disgustingly large number of Americans thinks he practices Islam.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />Obama is a Christian (or so he says!). He is fighting a swarm of smears flying around the Internet that claim he was sworn into the Senate on the Koran (false) and that he doesn't put his hand on his heart when swearing allegiance to the American flag (also false).<o:p></o:p><br /><br />So Obama met this week with Ehud Olmert, Israel's prime minister, and vowed that <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Jerusalem</st1:place></st1:city> should forever be the Jewish nation's capital and that the country should also be able to defend itself.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />Yeah, that sounds like something a Muslim would say, right?<o:p></o:p><br /><br />Nearly 10 percent of Americans <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2008-04-01-obama-muslim_N.htm">think Obama is a Muslim</a>. That's one in 10 - or 7,000 bitter blue-collar workers clinging to guns and religion in Scranton, Pa., or 54 bigots in the nowhere town of Sherman, Miss.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />TEN PERCENT.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />Are you surprised? In a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/07/barackobama.johnmccain">poll</a> that asked voters to name the first word that popped into their heads when they heard a candidate's name, 19 percent said "old" for <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/16/john-mccain-doesnt-know-how-to-use-a-computer/">John McCain</a>, and 3 percent said "Muslim" for Obama.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />CNN, the most trusted name in loud graphics, decided a couple months ago to throw a cameraman to the streets and ask people what religion Obama practices. One well-informed voter proclaimed, "He says he's a Catholic, but I think he's a Muslim."<o:p></o:p><br /><br />These types of stats were good enough reason for the Obama campaign to <a href="http://www.infocusnews.net/content/view/23341/582/">shoo away</a> two Muslim women from standing behind the Democratic candidate at a June rally in <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Detroit</st1:place></st1:city> because they were wearing Islamic headscarves.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />Candidates fight lies all the time (remember how Al Gore invented the Internet?). Some voters will always think Obama is a Muslim. But the real racism comes from the propagators of these <a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp">whisper emails</a> that blast inboxes with comments like these:<o:p></o:p><br /><br />"Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim."<o:p></o:p><br /><br />"Barack Hussein Obama will NOT recite the Pledge of Allegiance nor will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama turns his back to the flag and slouches."<o:p></o:p><br /><br />"The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the U.S. from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!!"<o:p></o:p><br /><br />It sounds ridiculous, but people believe it. You can bet Obama was thinking about these people when he was in Israel and meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.<o:p></o:p><br /><br />And you can bet he'll be thinking about these voters on Nov. 4.<br /><br />(Update: Obama <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07252008/news/worldnews/israeli_newspaper_publishes_obamas_weste_121564.htm">asked God</a> in a note that he put in the Western Wall to make him an "instrument of your will.")<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/24/would-a-muslim-wear-this/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1266261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/24/would-a-muslim-wear-this/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/24/would-a-muslim-wear-this/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Matt Negrin</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-24T13:57:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Playing by New Rules with Religious Voters</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/02/playing-by-new-rules-with-religious-voters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/02/playing-by-new-rules-with-religious-voters/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/02/playing-by-new-rules-with-religious-voters/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/us-elections/" rel="tag">US Elections</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/washington-university/" rel="tag">Washington University</a></p>Add religion to the growing list of reasons why the 2008 presidential election is shaping up to be different from those that preceded it.<br /><br />It used to be that the religious right was the only bloc of religious voters seriously in play - and then, it was only really a question of whether they would mobilize to vote for the Republican candidate or not.<br /><br />This year, however, religious voters of all faiths are being courted from every direction as candidates look to build new coalitions and capitalize on new strengths. From the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC to evangelical churches around the country, both candidates are making the rounds to gain support.<br /><br /><span class="lead"></span><br /> <img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="300" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/07/barack-obama-shul225a20080702.jpg" alt="" />This week, The New York Times has already reported twice on the efforts of Senator Obama (pictured at right during a speech at a synagouge) to court the traditionally Republican evangelical community. <br /> <br /> On Tuesday, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/us/politics/01evangelicals.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">John Border reported about</a> former Bush supporters that have been swayed by Senator Obama's message of unity and reconciliation. Today, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/02/us/politics/02obama.html?ref=politics">Jeff Zeleny and Michael Luo reported about</a> Senator Obama's plan to expand the delivery of social services through churches and other religious organizations - a move that takes a page from the Bush playbook.<br /> <br /> Although Obama's plan to expand federal grants to religious organizations builds off of groundwork laid by the Bush administration, it differs in one key aspect: religious organizations receiving federal funding cannot use religion as a factor in distributing services or hiring personnel.<br /> <br /> For his part, Senator McCain has also been looking to shore up his credentials with evangelicals in an attempt to draw strength from the voting bloc that propelled President Bush to the White House. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-campaign30-2008jun30,0,4564705.story">McCain met earlier this week with Billy and Franklin Graham</a>, emerging with praise from the powerful father-son pair but not an endorsement.<br /> <br /> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" alt="" id="img1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/07/john-mccain-kotel425a20080702.jpg" /><br />On another front, McCain (pictured above at the Western Wall in Jerusalem) has been looking to court Jewish voters - especially those who supported Mayor <span class="lead">Rudy Giuliani. McCain frequently plays up his support for Israel and from now-Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman. McCain also stands a chance at winning the historically Democratic Jewish vote because of his strong stance against Iran (seen as a clear foe of Israel) and the rumors that Senator Obama is or was a Muslim.<br /> <br /> Obama, who has also spent time courting the Jewish vote, has been hurt by the same things that have helped McCain: his apparently weak stance on Iran and the same malicious rumor regarding his religious heritage. <br /> <br /> Notably, the only voters <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/06/24/obamas-other-problem-with-islam/">left out of the religious fray have been Muslims</a>, who, once again, have been marginalized by American society.</span><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/02/playing-by-new-rules-with-religious-voters/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1243483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/02/playing-by-new-rules-with-religious-voters/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/07/02/playing-by-new-rules-with-religious-voters/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>john mccain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>religion</category><category>religious voters</category><category>ReligiousVoters</category><dc:creator>Sam Guzik</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-02T21:01:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Obama's Other Problem With Islam</title><link>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/06/24/obamas-other-problem-with-islam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/06/24/obamas-other-problem-with-islam/</guid><comments>http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/06/24/obamas-other-problem-with-islam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/us-elections/" rel="tag">US Elections</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/religion/" rel="tag">Religion</a>, <a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/category/washington-university/" rel="tag">Washington University</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/06/barack-obama-rally450a06242008.jpg"  alt="" /><br />Though Senator Barack Obama is running his campaign around the mantra of change and progress, it seems that he is having some difficulty breaking away from troublesome post-9/11 treatment of Muslims in American politics.<br /><br />"While the senator has visited churches and synagogues, he has yet to appear at a single mosque. Muslim and Arab-American organizations have tried repeatedly to arrange meetings with Mr. Obama, but officials with those groups say their invitations - unlike those of their Jewish and Christian counterparts - have been ignored," Andrea Elliott of The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/24/us/politics/24muslim.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">reports today</a>. <br /><br />According to the article, in the past several weeks the Obama campaign has made several choices that have been interpreted as a snub to Muslim Americans - including barring two Muslim women wearing head scarves  from appearing behind Mr. Obama at a rally in Detroit and avoiding a campaign appearance with Representative Keith Ellison, the country's first Muslim congressman.<br />Obama's message of hope and unity has appealed to many Muslim voters who have been largely marginalized in American politics for the past several years. <br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/brighthall.aol.com/media/2008/06/barack-obama-hebrew200a06242008.jpg" alt="" />Throughout the campaign the senator has appealed to an interfaith audience in his speeches and, recently, he recorded a radio advertisement for the campaign of Representative Andre Carson, Democrat of Indiana, who this spring became the second Muslim elected to Congress. Obama has gone out of his way to court Jewish voters, speaking passionately about Israel at synagogues around the country (pictured at right) and at the recent AIPAC conference.<br /><br />At the same time, recent events combined with frustration over how Obama has handled the rumors that he is a Muslim or that he studied in a radical Islamic madrassa have tempered the general trend.<br /><br />The Obama campaign's official "Fight the Smears" website proclaims that Obama "has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is a committed Christian." In The Times story, several Muslims take issue with the campaign's decision to classify being Muslim as a smear - and rightfully so.<br /><br />Seven years after September 11, the nation has still not learned the difference between practicing Islam and practicing terror under the guise of radical Islam. <br /><br />It is a shame that in a nation that prides itself on allowing religious freedom there is even a discussion of a candidates religion during an election - let alone a discussion of whether it is good politics to allow Muslims to stand behind the candidate.<br /><br />Real change - the kind worth believing in - will only come once our nation is willing to move beyond  naive prejudice and understand the beliefs of others.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/06/24/obamas-other-problem-with-islam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/forward/1235411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/06/24/obamas-other-problem-with-islam/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://brighthall.aol.com/2008/06/24/obamas-other-problem-with-islam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>muslims</category><dc:creator>Sam Guzik</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-06-24T14:21:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>