Bishop to Boycott Obama Commencement Speech
2009 College Grads: We're the Lucky Ones
Why there is hope for the graduating Class of 2009, and how they can find work in a recession...Read the postBeer in Vending Machines -- What Drinking Age?
U.S. policies on drinking age seem restrictive when examining the rest of the world...Read the postHow The Press Can Remain Relevant
Is it any surprise that Obama has employed a strategy to cordon journalists that is similar to previous administrations?...Read the postBe Afraid, Cheney Warns. Be Very Afraid.
Just when you thought the Bush-era warnings of Armageddon around the corner were over, Cheney strikes again...Read the postObama: You Wouldn't Like Me When I'm Angry...
Obama threw down his stick, spat on the floor and growled in the face of cameras -- metaphorically... Read the postObama to GOP: 'I Won, I'm The President'
"You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," Obama told GOP leaders...Read the postPalin Seeks $11M Book Deal, but Can She Read?
One can only imagine what Republican rising star Sarah Palin could possibly write about in her memoirs...Read the postboston university
AP NEWS ALERT: We Just Got Interesting
Animated disagreement between coworkers is a venerable tradition often denied to Bright Hall's far-flung, break room-less staff. Advise & Dissent is an attempt to fix that. Click here for past debates.
Reading a news story is nothing like talking to the reporter who wrote it.
If you've ever spoken to a journalist, you know how true that is. Maybe, in conversation, the reporter reveals more information, or more background that comes from spending years on the same beat.
Or maybe he gives you his perspective -- and not an ill-researched, slanted opinion like the ones you find in super-partisan literature, or in the comments section at the bottom of blog posts like this. A reporter who spends a half-dozen months covering a presidential candidate sometimes knows more about that person than the candidate himself.
At the very least, reporters know much, much more than what they write in their stories, simply because a news hole is finite but knowledge is not.
One man who understands that principle is Ron Fournier, the newWashington bureau chief for the Associated Press, who has encouraged his staff to put themselves in their stories. This has ushered in ledes written in first-person, and a writing style that is more unconventional to the AP than the flat tax is to congressional Democrats.
That's a joke that wouldn't have flown at the bureau until Ron took over in May. Since then he has essentially asked his reporters to be more human. It's the reason I called him by his first name at the beginning of this paragraph, and the reason I used the word "I" three times in this sentence.
Yeah, the AP is going to be around forever. It will always be the first to the news, and it will always be the most accurate and fair news service. To suggest it is biased because its reporters have suddenly been told to use the right sides of their brains is to reveal limited knowledge of what bias is.
Bias suggests intent. The intent of an AP reporter is not the same as the intent of the propaganda distributors for the campaigns of Democrat Barack Obama, Republican John McCain or still-deciding Mitt Romney.
What my colleague probably meant, in accusing the AP of a flaming bias, is that the most reliable institution of information in the world is suddenly becoming more conversational, and more appealing to readers at a time when most Americans would rather watch Miss USA 2008 fall down than pick up a newspaper.
There is nothing wrong with veteran political reporter Beth Fouhy leading her story with, "I miss Hillary." You know why? Because she does. And if she didn't write that, she wouldn't be telling you the whole truth.
If you've ever spoken to a journalist, you know how true that is. Maybe, in conversation, the reporter reveals more information, or more background that comes from spending years on the same beat.
Or maybe he gives you his perspective -- and not an ill-researched, slanted opinion like the ones you find in super-partisan literature, or in the comments section at the bottom of blog posts like this. A reporter who spends a half-dozen months covering a presidential candidate sometimes knows more about that person than the candidate himself.
At the very least, reporters know much, much more than what they write in their stories, simply because a news hole is finite but knowledge is not.
One man who understands that principle is Ron Fournier, the new
That's a joke that wouldn't have flown at the bureau until Ron took over in May. Since then he has essentially asked his reporters to be more human. It's the reason I called him by his first name at the beginning of this paragraph, and the reason I used the word "I" three times in this sentence.
Yeah, the AP is going to be around forever. It will always be the first to the news, and it will always be the most accurate and fair news service. To suggest it is biased because its reporters have suddenly been told to use the right sides of their brains is to reveal limited knowledge of what bias is.
Bias suggests intent. The intent of an AP reporter is not the same as the intent of the propaganda distributors for the campaigns of Democrat Barack Obama, Republican John McCain or still-deciding Mitt Romney.
What my colleague probably meant, in accusing the AP of a flaming bias, is that the most reliable institution of information in the world is suddenly becoming more conversational, and more appealing to readers at a time when most Americans would rather watch Miss USA 2008 fall down than pick up a newspaper.
There is nothing wrong with veteran political reporter Beth Fouhy leading her story with, "I miss Hillary." You know why? Because she does. And if she didn't write that, she wouldn't be telling you the whole truth.
Join The Discussion
Categories
Most Popular Stories »
- Summer releases are out
- Cartoon Editorial: Kevin Jonas engaged
- The Department of Education takes more control over student loans
- Actress plays on hit show 'True Blood'
- Public Enemy, or public hero?
Latest BRIGHT HALL Headlines
Latest News »
Most Recent Comments »
Bright Buzz »
TeaParty obama AmericanUniversity msnbc NewConcord TeaProtest gay Mercury7 same-sex TeaPartiers republicans SupremeCourt vermont marriage JaneaneGarofalo BirkatHachama kutner iowa house environment PaulBegala teabaggers RushLimbaugh judaism ChristopherColumbus MuskingumCollege teabagging BrownUniversity perry educat states texas JohnGlenn KeithOlbermann ForthAmendment HaroldAndKumar sun Ohio ColumbusDay NASA secession ban SandraRedding









Recent Comments »
Page 1/1
Post Your Comments Below
Ouch
8:25PM 8:25PM Jul 21st 2008
Matt Negrin, you are full of crap. How can a reporter be fair or accurate when he puts his opinions or views into the work? That completely goes against the nature of honest, true journalism. What a load of BS.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Char-lay
8:26PM 8:26PM Jul 21st 2008
I completely disagree with the above post. Not only does first-person journalism make stories more interesting; it adds an extra dimension that goes beyond just straight reporting of the facts. A journalist’s opinion in a story still invites the readers to form their own opinions, whether it’s the same opinion or something completely different.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Ouch
8:27PM 8:27PM Jul 21st 2008
You read the news to find out what happens, not to find out what a particular person thinks about it. The news should be factual so the readers can form their own opinions. Otherwise the story is nothing but that: a story. NOT news. Matt Negrin, you don’t know what you’re talllking about.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Char-lay
8:28PM 8:28PM Jul 21st 2008
But beyond all this, with first person a story can take on new dimensions in description.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Char-lay
8:29PM 8:29PM Jul 21st 2008
Eff you. You know it’s true. And if you don't, I'll bite you.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Ouch
8:33PM 8:33PM Jul 21st 2008
Now that’s a load of horse shit.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Ouch
8:34PM 8:34PM Jul 21st 2008
Ouuuuuuch. Ouch, Char-lay. That really hurt.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Hunter Thompson
10:37PM 10:37PM Jul 21st 2008
Shut up you fucking swine, or I'll sick the fucking leeches on you! These AP reporters must think they're doing some real gonzo journalism. Bullshit! I'm a fucking doctor of journalism, man! I know these things! Anyone seen the ether?
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!
Keith Schath
1:28PM 1:28PM Jul 22nd 2008
This article doesn't address the more pertinent political bias that keeps news from being fairly and honestly reported.
If an issue such as "drilling for more oil" isn't presented in as complete a list of pertinent facts surrounding the realities of if it will or won't actually make a difference the public is not being well informed. It isn't tree hugging liberals looking at other alternatives anymore, it's those looking at how much money the government invests in oil, where supply and demand will be if we back the oil, and where it will be if we put the government backing into reducing the need for oil.
Aggressively backed alternatives can reduce the demand for oil multiples over the outcome of continuing to put huge funding into the oil industry.
Every person who backs the drill for more oil line should be willing to look at well presented cost and timeline information that correlates reduced need for oil and be willing to change their mind according to new information in. Right now there are too many willing to make a decision and stick to it way beyond where it is no longer valid.
Rating :
Reply to this commentReport!